One model, six depths
The same spacecraft serves Grade 6 and university learners. What changes is the academic depth disclosed, not the physics — so the progression is real rather than repackaged.
For school leaders
One spacecraft model from Grade 6 to university, no hardware and no installation — and no claim we cannot evidence. Try it as Open Practice without accounts, or use Managed School, where assigned work, submissions and released teacher feedback persist.
The same spacecraft serves Grade 6 and university learners. What changes is the academic depth disclosed, not the physics — so the progression is real rather than repackaged.
Every mission ends with a prediction, a comparison, an engineering decision and a limitation statement. That is what the teacher reviews.
Evidence is labelled simulated, derived or reference. Nothing is presented as measured flight data, and no accreditation is claimed.
Open Practice asks for no learner account on the routes that support it, and creates no institutional School record or submission — a learner's work stays in their own browser where a local record is implemented. Managed School adds institution and class enrolment so assigned work, submissions and released teacher feedback persist. Neither needs hardware, an installation or an LMS integration.
The same spacecraft, disclosed at six increasing depths. A Grade 6 learner and an university use one model.
| Stage | Band | What learners do | Observable verbs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | ML-A Explorer | Observe & Explain | Identify · observe · measure · explain |
| Grade 7 | ML-A Explorer | Control & Compare | Predict · compare · control · explain |
| Grade 8 | ML-A Explorer | Design & Justify | Design · justify · choose · defend |
| Grades 9–10 | ML-B Builder | Calculate · Model · Compare · Test | Calculate · model · compare · test |
| Grades 11–12 | ML-C Engineer | Analyse · Program · Evaluate · Optimise | Analyse · program · evaluate · optimise |
| University | ML-D Mission Systems | Design · Integrate · Verify · Validate | Design · integrate · verify · validate |
Thirteen runnable pilot missions cover fourteen experiments. MLX-12 remains mapped but unavailable, and every runnable mission remains pending educator review.
Both use the same spacecraft model and the same missions. What differs is whether the work persists, and who can assess it.
Run missions without an institution. Account-free where the route supports it, and the learner's work stays in their own browser.
A class runs one exact released Grade Programme. Assigned work and submitted evidence persist, a teacher assesses them, and released feedback reaches the learner.
7 curated Grade Programmes, Grade 6 to Grade 12, covering 75 sessions in total. One exact released Programme is selected per class.
| Grade | Programme | Pacing | Weeks | Sessions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | Grade 6 — spacecraft foundations | Weekly guided programme; paired case runs in comparison weeks | 6 | 8 | Pilot — educator review and classroom evidence pending |
| Grade 7 | Grade 7 — mission evidence and comparison | Weekly guided programme; paired technical cases and preparation sessions | 8 | 11 | Pilot — educator review and classroom evidence pending |
| Grade 8 | Grade 8 — six-week spacecraft systems programme | Weekly; paired case runs in comparison weeks | 6 | 8 | Pilot — educator review and classroom evidence pending |
| Grade 9 | Grade 9 — quantitative mission analysis | Weekly quantitative programme with paired technical case sessions | 9 | 11 | Pilot — educator review and classroom evidence pending |
| Grade 10 | Grade 10 — systems trade analysis | Weekly systems-trade programme with evidence checkpoint | 10 | 12 | Pilot — educator review and classroom evidence pending |
| Grade 11 | Grade 11 — engineering evidence analysis | Weekly engineering-analysis programme with evidence checkpoint | 10 | 12 | Pilot — educator review and classroom evidence pending |
| Grade 12 | Grade 12 — systems engineering capstone | Weekly capstone programme with two synthesis checkpoints and final defence | 11 | 13 | Pilot — educator review and classroom evidence pending |
Three entries, one per role. Signing in decides what you can see; these links only say where to go.
Approve the School Programme for a class and see institution readiness.
Your class, its Programme, the next session, preparation and learner progress.
Your Programme, your assigned mission work, your submissions and released feedback.
Short list, and it stays short.
One computer per pair of learners, with a modern browser. No installation.
Depends on the mode. Open Practice asks no learner to register. Managed School uses institution and class enrolment, so assigned work, submissions and released teacher feedback can persist.
None. The spacecraft is a software model; no kit is required to complete a mission.
One planning period. The lesson ships with prompts, an answer key, misconceptions and timings.
Two sessions of about 55–70 minutes, or one double period.
A standard school connection. Nothing is streamed or downloaded.
Illustrative shapes for a first engagement — how long it runs and who it is for. These are not the Managed School Grade Programmes above; those are the seven curated Grade 6 to 12 Programmes a class is actually assigned.
2 sessions · One Grade 7 class, 10–15 learners in pairs
Enough evidence for the school to judge whether the approach fits its learners.
8 weeks · One class, one grade
A sustained mission strand that sits alongside the existing science scheme.
12 weeks · One class, Grades 9-10 and above
A vertical STEM pathway using one spacecraft model, ending on verification.
16 weeks · One cohort, Grades 11-12 and above
The complete mission catalogue over one semester, ending on a bounded engineering claim.